It is difficult these days to find a religious apologist who doesn't rely on the idea that reason, logic, and objective evidence are not reliable. By doing this they are implicitly admitting that their viewpoint is not supported by those things.
When a group of people who represent a particular viewpoint spend a lot of their time advocating the position that reason, logic, and objective evidence are not reliable, then one can rest assured that the viewpoint they represent isn't supported by those things and you should simply point out that they are admitting this is true.
"You are admitting that your viewpoint is not supported by logic or evidence."
When a group of people who represent a particular viewpoint spend a lot of their time advocating the position that reason, logic, and objective evidence are not reliable, then one can rest assured that the viewpoint they represent isn't supported by those things and you should simply point out that they are admitting this is true.
"You are admitting that your viewpoint is not supported by logic or evidence."
No comments:
Post a Comment