When you hear the "existence of the universe proves god exists" argument, one of the ways to counter it is to boil their logic down to its essentials so that they can see it for the ludicrous argument that it is:
"Essentially, your reasoning is that if there is a question no one can answer and someone offers an answer anyway, then that must be the right answer--no matter what. And, you say that it remains the right answer until someone disproves it (even if it can't be disproved) and proves an alternative--even if the first answer was never subject to such a test of proof."
"Essentially, your reasoning is that if there is a question no one can answer and someone offers an answer anyway, then that must be the right answer--no matter what. And, you say that it remains the right answer until someone disproves it (even if it can't be disproved) and proves an alternative--even if the first answer was never subject to such a test of proof."
No comments:
Post a Comment